Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Geforce 3 and Lighting

  1. #1
    Senior Member Regular Contributor
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    137

    Geforce 3 and Lighting

    From the demo clip of Geforce 3 and id softwares new gaming engine, John Carmack said that we will no longer need any hacks to implement lightings in engines anymore. Does that mean we will no longer need lightmaps to simulate lighting and simply use OpenGL lights to do all the lightiig in the engine. And if thats the case how can 8 lights be used to implement all the lighting in a map. Are the lights reused (repositioned) before drawing every new object...?

  2. #2
    Senior Member Regular Contributor
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    B.C., Canada
    Posts
    367

    Re: Geforce 3 and Lighting

    I think what he meant was that for shadowing techniques, we are now able to use one method for the whole scene at acceptable speeds. So instead of having to use shadow volumes in one place, static shadow maps in another, and dynamic shadow maps in yet another, we will be able to use shadow maps for the whole scene.

    The GeForce3 supports 2 extensions, SGIX_depth_texture and SGIX_shadows, that can be used to do shadowing relatively easily. By having a shadow map associated with each light, shadows can be cast by anything, onto anything.

    With previous graphics cards, this technique wasn't very practical due to texture resolution problems and a lack of fill rate.

    j

  3. #3
    Senior Member Regular Contributor
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Dunblane, Scotland
    Posts
    333

    Re: Geforce 3 and Lighting

    The GeForce 3 can have up to 64 dynamic per a pixel lights.
    Reality is for idiots only the best over come it!

  4. #4
    Senior Member Regular Contributor
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    B.C., Canada
    Posts
    367

    Re: Geforce 3 and Lighting

    Where did you hear that?

    I'd like to see the document you got it from.

    64 per pixel lights is a LOT.

    j

  5. #5
    Senior Member Regular Contributor
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Dunblane, Scotland
    Posts
    333

    Re: Geforce 3 and Lighting

    It wasn't an official document so obviously it could be wrong. I thought 64 was alot but i am sure that some professional graphics cards can have 64 lights so it might be possible for a GeForce3 with such a fast TnL engine and fast memory.
    Reality is for idiots only the best over come it!

  6. #6
    Senior Member Regular Contributor
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    B.C., Canada
    Posts
    367

    Re: Geforce 3 and Lighting

    64 vertex lights I can understand, but 64 per-pixel lights?

    On a GeForce2, doing a perpixel light imitation would take at least 1 texture unit for a directional light, and 2 for a point light.

    Even with texture shaders and all the extra extensions, 64 per-pixel lights sounds a bit over the top to me.

    j

  7. #7
    Member Contributor
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    89

    Re: Geforce 3 and Lighting

    hehehe actually, I don't think you've seen the screenie of the Geforce3 board itself. It has a HUGE @$$ heatsink over it, and it is so big that I personally think that it would be better to put a liquid cooler in place of it. It covers the entire GPU and all the memory, and will probably end up having 800+ fans on there to cool it! :P
    -pATCheS

  8. #8
    Senior Member Regular Contributor
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Dunblane, Scotland
    Posts
    333

    Re: Geforce 3 and Lighting

    pATChes11, you mean that to over clock it we will have to install a liquid cooler, or Co2 cooler instead of placing hundreds of oversized 5 inch fans all over the card front and back ...
    Reality is for idiots only the best over come it!

  9. #9
    Senior Member Regular Contributor
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    B.C., Canada
    Posts
    367

    Re: Geforce 3 and Lighting

    The chip might be big, but that doesn't say anything about how fast it can do per-pixel lighting, does it?

    I think if you are going to do serious overclocking with _any_ chip, you might as well use liquid cooling.

    j

  10. #10
    Junior Member Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Milwaukee WI 53211
    Posts
    29

    Re: Geforce 3 and Lighting

    What exactly is light mapping? And how come when I use UnrealEd I can place a lot more than 8 lights in my map? I know that Unreal isn't using OpenGL but the fact that some cards can only support a maximum of 8 lights should still apply. I'm confused

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-24-2013, 08:26 AM
  2. Testing on GeForce FX, GeForce 8 and Radeon X1k
    By k_szczech in forum OpenGL: Windows
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 05-03-2007, 02:40 PM
  3. GeForce 2 mx slower then Geforce 1?
    By HighCv2 in forum OpenGL: User Software
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 05-22-2001, 03:21 PM
  4. About lighting (not OpenGL lighting, but general lighting)
    By Anonymous Coward in forum OpenGL: Basic Coding
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-04-2001, 09:10 AM
  5. Geforce 256 pixel shader VS Geforce 3 ps
    By WD40 in forum OpenGL: Advanced Coding
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 03-02-2001, 12:16 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Proudly hosted by Digital Ocean