Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: better way to do this?

  1. #1
    Senior Member Regular Contributor
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    New Zealand

    better way to do this?

    i was looking at bump mapping and i found out that its all about changing normals to back things look bumpy
    i was wondering would it be costly to performace if i subdivided a mesh and sorted the normals out on that then just slaped a texture on top??
    or is there a better way to do this?

  2. #2
    Senior Member OpenGL Pro
    Join Date
    Dec 2007

    Re: better way to do this?

    Bumpmapping essiantaly is a tradeoff between fillrate and geometry complexity. Geometry complexity is lowered, thus skinning and all other mesh deforming algorithms that work on the vertices can be executed faster. You also save bandwith when transfering the geometry to the (v/g)pu. The bumpmap can be preloaded. However bumpmaps only fake complexity. That's why they thought displacement mapping would be a good idea. It applies geometry complexity _after_ the geometry arrived in the (v/g)pu, thus it means not faking complecity and saving bandwith (per frame) anyways.
    There are some other issues too...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Proudly hosted by Digital Ocean